Why bin/cue?

From: Malev <malev_malev_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 2 Dec 2003 05:16:41 -0800

"smh" <smhong_at_mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3FCC3E65.84631CC0_at_mindspring.com...
> . --------------------------------------
> Mike Richter, were you born with
> "Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
> --------------------------------------
> (Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3F2D8973.EBCD8386_at_mindspring.com
> (Messages 10, 12 -- 34, 54 -- 69)
>
> ( No pipsqueaks have been able to prove ANY of the above is a libel )
> ( -- despite Mikey's supposed to have proof of misquotes! )
>
>
> Mike Richter (Lying Scum) wrote:
> >
> > > A BIN file is an ISO of, in your case, the original "Chief Architect"
> > > software disc, and the CUE is its index file.
> >
> > A small but critical point: A BIN file is an image - not an ISO.
>
> Man, ain't you one smarty ass. Expert on all cdr matters?
>
> You did not wade in with "small but critical point" drivel to this. Why
> not, Mikey? Did you agree with William Leech's cockamamie, Mikey?
>
> ====================
> From: William Leech <- Moderator of no less than advanced cdr list!
> Date: 11/21/01
>
> I've had to recover a W2K machine where ASPI had been used.
> Likewise a WinMe machine.
>
> The cause was definitely the ASPI layer.
> ====================
>
> ----------------------------
> Mikey, you are a Slimy Scum!
> ----------------------------

Your ass is plonked , bitch.

malev_at_selamer.com Received on Tue Dec 02 2003 - 05:16:42 PST